Why Development Approvals feel harder than ever.
Across Queensland, there’s no shortage of conversation about housing supply, growth, and getting more development moving.
But on the ground, many developers and landowners are asking the same question:
If we need more homes, why does getting a Development Application approved feel harder than ever?
At EVERETT, this isn’t something we’re observing from the sidelines. We’re navigating the approvals system every day, on our own developments and alongside our clients’ projects across South East Queensland.
The disconnect between policy and reality
At a high level, governments talk about housing targets, supply pipelines, and reform. At a project level, however, approvals often slow down due to a combination of:
- information requests that expand over time
- evolving interpretations of planning controls
- referral agency requirements
- cautious assessment processes
- and limited opportunity for early, practical guidance
Rarely is it one “big issue”. More often, it’s a series of smaller hurdles that quietly add months to a programme.
For developers, those delays have real consequences, holding costs increase, funding windows tighten, feasibility margins get squeezed, and momentum is lost.
What we’re seeing across projects
One consistent theme we’re seeing is that good projects aren’t failing because they’re non‑compliant — they’re stalling because the process itself is complex and risk‑averse.
This affects:
- residential subdivisions
- infill and medium‑density housing
- industrial and mixed‑use projects
- and even relatively straightforward applications
And it’s not unique to one council.
What actually helps move approvals forward
From experience, the projects that perform best through the approvals process are rarely the ones that “just lodge and hope”.
What helps is doing the work before the DA is submitted.
That typically includes:
- early feasibility and site strategy
- pre‑lodgement discussions with council officers
- council‑ready documentation (not just concept plans)
- designing with assessment benchmarks in mind
- and, where appropriate, early engagement with the local councillor to understand local context and process constraints
Councillors often can’t attend pre‑lodgement meetings, and even when they do, their ability to comment can be limited. A separate early discussion can provide useful context and help sharpen the right questions before formal assessment begins.
Our approach at EVERETT
At EVERETT, we approach development the same way an owner would — practical, commercial, and risk‑aware.
We don’t promise that approvals are “easy”. They’re not.
But we do focus on:
- reducing surprises
- improving clarity
- and setting projects up so they have the best possible chance of moving smoothly through the system
Because approvals aren’t just a planning exercise — they’re a risk management exercise.
If you’re feeling stuck
If you’re a landowner or developer feeling frustrated with the approvals process right now, you’re not alone.
Sometimes a short, early conversation about strategy, staging, or how to approach a lodgement can save months down the track.
If you’d like a second set of eyes on a site or a project pathway, EVERETT is always happy to talk it through. Contact us now.
Author
-
Dan Everett is a Registered Architect (QLD, NSW) and Superintendent (QLD, BOAQ) with a Master of Architecture and Master of Project Management, backed by a Bachelor of Architecture and Design. He holds Development Feasibility Certification and is completing a Certificate IV in Finance and Mortgage Broking alongside a Certificate IV in Property Services (Real Estate). As Director and Development Manager at EVERETT, Dan leads industrial, commercial, residential and mixed-use development projects across Queensland, working with landowners, private developers and investors from early feasibility through to delivery. He also invests in and operates development assets himself, bringing firsthand ownership experience to every project engagement.


